14th October 2021

 

MINUTES OF THE PARISH COUNCIL MEETING

 Thursday 14th October 2021

Held in Follifoot Village Hall, following the relaxation of Government guidelinesregarding the coronavirus pandemic.

PRESENT: Chairman N MacDermid, Vice Chairman A Dewsnip, Councillors C Dickinson and T Hall. In attendance, M Richards (Clerk), NYCC/HBC Cllr A Paraskos and 10 residents.

1.Apologies: Apologies for absence were received and accepted from CllrJ Locke who was on holiday and Cllrs T Martin and S Riley who were unwell. 

2Declaration of Interesand Notification of changes ithMembers’ 
   
Register of InterestNone. 

3. Public Participation session: The Chairman welcomed the ten residents
   to the meeting and confirmed that they were able to comment on any issues ​raised. Accordingly, a resident reported a near accident on the hump back 
    bridge on Plompton Road (Guilders Bridge), due to vehicles being improperly 
    parked on the bridge. The clerk will raise the matter again with NY Police. 

4.Minutes of the meetings held on 9th September 2021:CouncillorDewsnip proposed the minutes to be a correct record, seconded by CouncillorHall. The Chairman then duly signed the minutes. 

5. Matters arising from thprevious minutes: Dealt with as part of the 
   agenda.

      6. Chairman’s communications 
         
 a) The Chairman reported that he had been notified of a recurrence of dog 
          fouling, including on the verges of Radcliffe Close and also in the cricket field. 
          The clerk will raise again with the HBC Dog Warden and request her to visit 
          and patrol at varied times to hopefully identify those responsible. The Parish 
          Council also asked that pet owners take greater responsibility for collecting up 
          and disposing of their dog’s “poo”.
          b) The Primary School has been informed that the entrance gate on Main 
          Street does not meet Health and Safety standards and is therefore looking to 
          instal a higher gate. Councillors were happy in principle with the proposal as 
         long as it meets planning regulations.

      7. Clerk’s correspondence received
          
a) Remembrance Day. Communication received from the Royal British 
          Legion, promoting various commemorative items (metal, “silhouette” 
          figures representing a “Tommy”) to be erected at suitable locations for 
          Remembrance Day. Councillors expressed an interest in the proposal but 
          were unsure whether the figures should be a permanent installation or just 
          temporary, say throughout November. It was considered that there would not 
         be sufficient time to order and supply for this year, but the clerk was instructed 
          to obtain details of costs and installation requirements for possible future 
          consideration. (A resident did suggest that it would be relatively easy to 
          construct a similar figure at a very modest cost). The Chairman 
          acknoweledged this comment but did suggest that one of the purposes was to 
          raise funds for the Royal British Legion.
          b) A resident of Pellentine Road had expressed concern at the adequacy of 
          street lighting and had approached NYCC for a possible solution (extra 
          lighting) but had been informed that the request needs to come from the 
          Parish Council. Councillors discussed the pros and cons, of this issue, 
          recognising this issue of safety, and it was resolved that contact be
        made with NYCC for clarification and all residents on Pellentine Road be 
          canvassed for their views. Cllr Paraskos commented that the new LED street 
          lights only had a “vertical footprint” ie did not illuminate a wide area, but more 
          specifically, funding thereof would be a significant issue and, if needed, it may 
          fall on the Parish Council to fund.

      8Follifields. 
          a) Maintenance update. The clerk reported that a revised quotation for the 
            work had now been received from the grasscutting contractor which 
            compared favourably with that from the Village Handyman, and he was able 
            to commence work almost immediately, rather than waiting until Spring 2022. 
             Councillors agreed with this quotation. The clerk will remind the contractor 
             about the filling in of the fence post holes in the verge down Radcliffe Close, 
            and will also ask for the cutting back of the wildflower area and buddleia to be 
             undertaken in October/November.

           b) Goal posts and nets. Goal post stanchions now installed and custom made 
            goal nets ordered (although there is a 5-6 week delivery time)            

    9Parish matters 

          a) Plompton.

           i) Cllr Hall asked that the salt/grit bins be replenished in time for winter

          conditions – the clerk will contact NYCC Highways.

           ii) A661/Plompton road junction. A resident reported that she had recently

           been involved in a 3 vehicle accident at this junction, on the entrance to

          Plompton. She suggested that a) more “SLOW” signs be added, in both 

           directions (from Harrogate and Spofforth) and, b) a sign denoting “Hidden 

           Turn” be erected, before the bend. Councillors also mentioned the possibility 

           of “rumble strips” and the erection of a street light at this location. If you get involved in a vehicular accident caused by a reckless driver, be sure to protect your rights by hiring an injury lawyer.

The clerk will discuss with the NYCC Highways Safety Officer. Cllr Dewsnip 

           commented that, following heavy rainfall, flooding was again occurring at this 

           location. Cllr Paraskos responded that he had spoken with the Highways 

           Engineer and the drain had recently been jetted and the soakaway cleared of 

           debris but the position would continue to be monitored.

           b) Village maintenance. The village benches are in the process of being

          refurbished. The Chairman asked if the quotation for the refurbishment of the 

           “Cullingworth bench” had been received? The clerk will contact the contractor

           for an update.

           c) Road safety.

           i) Picket fences – the fences have been ordered and the clerk is meeting with 

           the NYCC approved contractor tomorrow to agree the location and obtain a 

           cost estimate.

           ii) VAS. Cllr Dickinson had again extracted the data for the latest period 

           which revealed little difference month on month, with approximately 12% of 

           vehicles exceeding 35mph and 40% exceeding 30mph. The Parish Council 

           will continue to collect and share the data to see if there are improvements 

          over time. They will also consider reversing the direction of data capture to

           monitor and measure the speeds of vehicles leaving the village 

10.  Finance:
      a) Balance at the bank on 30th September 2021, Current Account £793.38 
     and Deposit Account £29,722.56 (total £30,515.94) Bank statements to be​ initialled by the Chairman in confirmation, as part of his payment  
      authorisation process.
      b) Monthly Reconciliation – reconciliation as at 30th September was provided 
      with receipts and payments in the period 31st August to 30th September,
      reconciling to the account balances shown above at a) Councillors 
      then unanimously agreed the 5 amounts below for payment.

M RichardsClerk’s salary- Sept.£295.36Bank Transfer
HMRCPAYE – Sept£73.84Bank Transfer
Stuart BushGrasscutting£145.00Bank Transfer
M RichardsPrint cartridge£17.49Bank Transfer
HBCROSPA inspection£72.00Bank Transfer

     c)The Chairman then ran through the budget spreadsheet, explaining the   
      updates following the expenditure recorded above. The Cumulative worksheet 
      demonstrates on a monthly basis, the Parish Council’s financial position, and 
      the summary sheet provides comparisons with the the annual budget. Cllr
      Dickinson asked why certain entries, eg the £665.00 for Fundraising, in the 
      Cumulative worksheet, showed a minus figure , in the “forecast year to go”    
     column. The Chairman explained that the “full year forecast column” should 
      have been adjusted to account for the unexpected increase in donations, and 
      this would be amended accordingly. The Chairman also said that all “year to
     go forecasts” for both income and expenditure will be reviewed and revised 
      for the next (and subsequent) meetings.Councillors had no other issues or 
      questions to raise.
      d) Internal Audit. The internal auditor summarised his report for the half year, 
      outlining the work completed. He was pleased to announce there were no 
     significant issues to raise, although his role has been slightly extended to 
      account for the fact that there would be no external audit scrutiny this year. 
      He had recommended that the Council’s Financial Regulations and Risk 
      Assessment be reviewed and the clerk had circulated updated documents for 
      councillor review. The internal auditor will review the draft documents and 
      make his observations and recommendations. Full discussion on the two 
      documents will be provided for on the next agenda.
      e) 2022/23 Precept. The clerk and Chairman will liaise to produce a draft 
      budget and precept demand for review at the November meeting. 

11. Planning:  

          a) Applications Received

        i) 21/03205/FUL -7 Plompton Square, Plompton – change of use of domestic 

      outbuilding to commercial short-term letting or holiday accommodation and 

      retention of timber outbuilding to house hot tub.

      Given the interest in this application, as evidenced by the number of residents 

      present, the Chairman ruled that each resident should be allowed to make 

      comments, in turn. The applicant firstly explained that the property (“The 

      Smithy”) had been in use as a holiday let for some 5 years and this 

     application for change of use had been occasioned by a change in rules. He 

      also commented that the reference to the hot tub had now been removed 

      from the application. Residents then made comments in turn. The comments 

      and observations are summarised, as follows:- Invasion of privacy, neighbouring properties overlooked- Impact on availability of car parking- Concerns over security- Increase in traffic and visitors- Noise from use of hot tub- Use of “unsightly” rotary clothes drier- Consultation with neighbours

         The applicant then responded to the above comments, asserting that, 

          due to its nature, Plompton is visited by hundreds of walkers each year, not 

          just his guests and “invasion of privacy” etc is a fact of life. Car parking is also 

          not just an issue with his visitors – the Smithy has its own parking area and 

          although only one car per resident should be parked in the communal area, 

          he is aware this condition is not followed. Use of the hot tub is limited to two 

          guests at a time but is also used by his family. He has attempted discourse 

          with his neighbours but not necessarily with satisfactory conclusions. The use 

          of the clothes drier is for the washing of an individual for whom he provides 

          care, and is not excessive. Councillors took careful account of both sides of  
          the argument and concluded that whilst some of the observations and 
         comments made could be classed as private disputes between neighbours 
          and are not valid planning grounds, they felt on balance, that the Parish 
          Council’s formal response should be to OBJECT, on the following planning 
          grounds:
​1) Loss of privacy to neighbouring properties
   ​2) Lack of sufficient car parking spaces
          3) Noise and disturbance resulting from use
          ii) 21/04271/FUL- Extension and alterations to raise the roof and demolition
          of existing flat roof front extension. Oak House Pannal Road Follifoot.
          iii) 21/04335/FUL – erection of single storey rear extension, Bryden House, 
          Pannal Road.
          The Chairman ran through the above two applications in turn, displaying both 
          existing and proposed site plans. Councillors reviewed in detail, considering in 
          particular the effect of proposals on neighbouring properties and the visual
          impact on the environment. In both cases, there were not felt to be any issues 
         of concern and it was agreed to SUPPORT the applications.
12Other matters
      None.       

There being no other business, the meeting closed at 8.50pm.

Date of next Parish Council Meeting: 
7.30pm on Thursday 11th November 2021, in Follifoot Village Hall, Tofts Lane, Follifoot.